Home

Ah, the loony left.  Ah, “language that even liberals can understand.” 
 
In phraseology eerily derivative of Ann Coulter’s new book title, Mr. Robert Huck attempts to persuade readers that the Duelfer report is not devastating to the Bush administration, particularly just weeks before a presidential election.  While Republican congresspersons privately admit it effectively kills the rationale for invading Iraq, and the White House itself harbors no illusions that it doesn’t, Mr. Huck buys the bogus interpretation favorable to George Bush then regurgitates it to the State Journal-Register in the form of his own original conclusions.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR                SUN  10  24  04
 
Channel 20 is to Sinclair as the SJ-R is to Copley
 
Confronted with the headline “Bush worthy of reelection,” I knew I had two options.  I could be angry or I could be amused.  Very, very amused.
 
Early into the article, I came upon this little gem:  “When al-Qaida terrorists struck, the president went on the offensive in aggressive fashion.  He perceived immediately…”  This would be the same president, I presume, who, warned of an imminent domestic attack via the infamous August 6, 2001 memo, continued to vacation on his Texas ranch.  The same president who, having been notified an attack had indeed occurred, froze for fully seven minutes to digest the information before he could begin to act upon it.
 
That’s downright hysterical.
 
Readers can be certain this editorial was not a local production, but dispatched from headquarters of the parent organization.  Seems TV Channel 20 is to Sinclair as The State Journal-Register is to the Copley press: held hostage.
 
Thanks for my laugh of the day.
 
 
Note to MM:  I don’t envy the avalanche of responses awaiting you.  Sorry to have contributed to it.
 

Here is a scan of a letter from a fan who
doesn't seem to like my opinions


Click to enlarge letter
Opens a new window



Click to enlarge Envelope
Opens a new window

Read more: Letter from a Fan in Virden, IL